Syllogistic Logic with Complements
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper continues the development of complete fragments of natural language by adding a noun-level complement operator to the basic syllogistic language of All X are Y and Some X are Y : in the fragment of this paper we can also say, for example, Some non-X are Y . We axiomatize this logic of this fragment in two ways: in a direct fashion, allowing the inference of an arbitrary sentence from a contradiction, and alternatively using a rule of reductio ad absurdum. The fact that the direct system is as strong as the indirect calls on a proof-theoretic examination. The completeness work overall uses representation of orthoposets.
منابع مشابه
A Rewriting Decision Procedure for Dijkstra-Scholten's Syllogistic Logic with Complements
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV
متن کاملA Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic
Ever since Łukasiewicz, it has been opinio communis that Aristotle’s modal syllogistic is incomprehensible due to its many faults and inconsistencies, and that there is no hope of finding a single consistent formal model for it. The aim of this paper is to disprove these claims by giving such a model. My main points shall be, first, that Aristotle’s syllogistic is a pure term logic that does no...
متن کاملPr ecis of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic
Aristotle was the founder of modal logic. In his Prior Analytics, he developed a complex system of modal syllogistic. While influential, this system has been disputed since antiquity and is today widely regarded as incoherent or inconsistent. In view of this, Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic explores the prospects for understanding the modal syllogistic as a coherent and consistent system of modal...
متن کاملExtending Syllogistic Reasoning
In this paper syllogistic logic is extended first to full propositional logic, and then an interesting fragment of predicate logic that
متن کاملSyllogistic Logic with Comparative Adjectives
This paper adds comparative adjectives to the known systems of syllogistic logic. The comparatives are interpreted by transitive and irreflexive relations. The main point is to obtain sound and complete axiomatizations of the logics.
متن کامل